4.3 Review

DSC and TMA Studies of Polysaccharide Physical Hydrogels

Journal

ANALYTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 211-219

Publisher

JAPAN SOC ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20SAR10

Keywords

Polysaccharide; water; hydrogel; DSC; TMA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the mechanism and thermal properties of various polysaccharides forming hydrogels, measuring the thermal characteristics of different hydrogels through methods such as differential scanning calorimetry and thermomechanical analysis, and establishing phase diagrams. The research shows that different polysaccharide hydrogels have different thermal properties and stability.
Various kinds of polysaccharides found in a wide variety of plants, bacteria, crustaceans and insects form hydrogels via physical aggregation in aqueous media. The major mass of hydrogels is water filled, ca. 95 - 99.5%, in a network structure, although the solid shape of the gel is maintained. In this paper, firstly the wide range of gelation mechanisms are briefly described, and then the thermal analysis of representative gel-forming polysaccharides, such as carrageenan, alginate, galactomannan, and pectin, is introduced. By differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), gel-sol and the sol-gel transition temperature of thermoreversible hydrogels are measured and phase diagram is established. It is suggested that binary systems showing sinusoidal gel-sol-gel transition are capable of being assembled. By thermomechanical analysis (TMA), the dynamic modulus (E') at around 1 x 10(4) Pa of thermo-irreversible hydrogels was obtained using a sample holder designed to measure the viscoelastic properties in water. Reliable coordination is shown between the results obtained by DSC and TMA. In this review, the current research and several topics on concerning the thermal properties of polysaccharide physical hydrogels are introduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available