4.8 Article

Simple and Rapid (Extraction) Protocol for NMR Metabolomics-Direct Measurement of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Metabolites Using Slice Selection

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 1451-1457

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03353

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new sample preparation method was proposed to shorten the preparation time of NMR samples, suitable for different sample types. Experimental results showed that this extraction protocol combined with slice-selection NMR experiments can be successfully used for metabolic investigations.
Investigating the metabolic profiles of solid sample materials with solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy requires the extraction of these metabolites. This is commonly done by using two immiscible solvents such as water and chloroform for extraction. Subsequent solvent removal makes these extraction procedures very time-consuming. To shorten the preparation time of the NMR sample, the following protocol is proposed: the metabolites from a solid or liquid sample are extracted directly in the NMR tube, the NMR tube is centrifuged, and the metabolite profiles in the aqueous and organic phases are determined by using slice-selective proton NMR experiments. This protocol was tested with 11 black teas and 11 green teas, which can be easily distinguished by their metabolic profiles in the aqueous phase. As a test case for liquid samples, 29 milk samples were investigated. The geographical origin of the diaries where the milk was processed could not be determined unequivocally from the metabolic profiles of the hydrophilic metabolites; however, this was easily seen in the lipid profiles. As shown for the different test samples, the extraction protocol in combination with slice-selection NMR experiments is suitable for metabolic investigations. Because samples are rapidly processed, this approach can be used to explore different extraction strategies for metabolite isolation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available