4.7 Article

Comparative Effectiveness of Protective Ventilation Strategies for Moderate and Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome A Network Meta-Analysis

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3039OC

Keywords

respiratory distress syndrome; adult; mechanical ventilation; prone position; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Funding

  1. CIHR Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that combining low tidal volume with prone ventilation is associated with the greatest reduction in mortality for critically ill adults with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
Rationale: Choosing the best ventilation strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is complex, yet it is highly relevant to clinicians during a respiratory pandemic. Objectives: To compare the effects of low V-T, high V-T, high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), prone ventilation, high-frequency oscillation, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) on mortality in ARDS. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. We applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to discern the relative effect of interventions on mortality. Measurements and Main Results: We analyzed 34 trials including 9,085 adults with primarily moderate-to-severe ARDS (median baseline Pa-O2/FIO2, 118; interquartile range, 110-143). Prone positioning combined with low VT was the best strategy (risk ratio [RR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.92] vs. low V-T; high certainty). VV ECMO was also rated among the best (RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.58-1.05] vs. low V-T; RR, 0.66; [95% CI, 0.49-0.88] vs. high V-T) but was rated with lower certainty because VV ECMO was restricted to very severe ARDS (mean baseline Pa-O2/FIO2,75). High PEEP combined with low V-T was rated intermediately (RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81-1.03] vs. low V-T; low certainty; RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91] vs. high VT; moderate certainty). High V-T was rated worst (RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.02-1.37] vs. low V-T; moderate certainty), and we found no support for high-frequency oscillation or high V-T with prone ventilation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that combining low VT with prone ventilation is associated with the greatest reduction in mortality for critically ill adults with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available