Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 178, Issue 4, Pages 343-351Publisher
AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20010094
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIMH [P50 MH080215]
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the University of Pittsburgh (NIH/NCRR/CTSA) [UL1 RR024153]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study identified a relationship between neural activation to rewards and response to psychotherapy in youths with anxiety disorders, showing differences compared to healthy youths. Activation in the striatum to rewards did not differentiate between anxiety and healthy youths, but greater striatal responsivity to rewards may help youths with anxiety improve during treatment. This suggests that function in reward circuitry may guide the development of treatments for youths with anxiety.
Objective: Identifying neural correlates of response to psychological treatment may inform targets for interventions designed to treat psychiatric disorders. This study examined the extent to which baseline functioning in reward circuitry is associated with response to psychotherapy in youths with anxiety disorders. Methods: A randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy compared with supportive therapy was conducted in youths with anxiety disorders. Before treatment, 72 youths (9-14 years old) with anxiety disorders and 37 group-matched healthy comparison youths completed a monetary reward functional MRI task. Treatment response was defined categorically as at least a 35% reduction in diagnostician-rated anxiety severity from pre- to posttreatment assessment. Pretreatment neural activation in the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during monetary wins relative to losses was examined in relation to treatment response. Results: Responders, nonresponders, and healthy youths differed significantly in mPFC activation to rewards versus losses at baseline. Youths with anxiety exhibited higher mPFC activity relative to healthy youths, although thismay have been driven by differences in depressive symptoms. Planned comparisons between treatment responders (N=48) and nonresponders (N=24) also revealed greater pretreatment neural activation in a cluster encompassing the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens among responders. Conclusions: Striatal activation to reward receipt may not differentiate youths with anxiety from healthy youths. However, higher striatal responsivity to rewards may allow youths with anxiety to improve during treatment, potentially through greater engagement in therapy. Function in reward circuitry may guide development of treatments for youths with anxiety.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available