Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23229
Keywords
long-term consistency; New World monkeys; nonhuman primate personality; personality assessment; personality comparison
Categories
Funding
- Universitat Wien
- Short-Term Grant Abroad (KWA), Uni:Docs Doctoral Fellowship
- Austrian Science Fund [P26806, Y366-B17]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Research on animal personality focuses on the temporal consistency of behaviors, stability of personality structures, and comparisons between laboratory and field conditions. Findings show that personality structures of common marmosets remained similar over four years in captivity, with significant differences observed in individuals who changed their social status. Under field conditions, personality structures somewhat resembled those in the laboratory.
Personality in animals has been extensively researched in recent decades. Temporal consistency of behaviors is almost always part of the personality definition and is usually explored in several different testing sessions or observation periods. However, it is still unclear whether the obtained personality constructs are stable across several years, which might be especially important for long-living animals, such as primates. Further, little is known on whether the personality structures obtained in the laboratory reflect the structures obtained under ecologically relevant conditions in the wild. Therefore, we conducted a battery of personality tests on common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) (N = 27), compared it with a test battery conducted 4 years beforehand on a subset of animals in captivity (N = 13) and ran an adapted version under field conditions at Baracuhy Biological Field Station, Brazil (N = 18). Under captive conditions, we found a remarkably similar personality structure across 4 testing years. Further, we found high long-term temporal consistency in the first two personality components, Boldness and Exploration; however, monkeys that changed their social (i.e., breeding) status between the two testing periods showed a significant increase in Boldness scores. Under field conditions, we found a somewhat similar personality structure as compared to the laboratory, which to some extent corroborates ecological validity of our personality test design. Nevertheless, whether the structure in the wild is suppressed or expanded in comparison to captivity, and in which way the social setting influences personality structure, should be further explored. Taken together, our results contribute to the discussion about the reliability and ecological validity of personality structures in nonhuman primates.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available