4.6 Article

Area-Level Predictors of Tobacco 21 Coverage in the US Before the National Law: Exploring Potential Disparities

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 29-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of NIH [R37CA214787]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterized the geographic and sociodemographic patterns of Tobacco 21 policies in the U.S. before the national law, showing disparities in coverage based on region, race/ethnicity, education, and poverty status. The findings suggest that the national Tobacco 21 law may help address these disparities and promote health equity.
Introduction: The goal of the paper is to characterize the geographic and sociodemographic patterns of policies prohibiting tobacco sales to people aged <21 years (i.e., Tobacco 21) at the local, county, and state levels in the U.S. before the national law. Methods: This study assessed area-level markers for region, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status, and smoke-free law coverage as predictors of Tobacco 21 passage as of December 20, 2019, using modified Poisson and negative binomial regression models with robust SEs. Data were analyzed in 2020. Results: Before the passage of the national policy, 191 million people were covered by Tobacco 21 laws. Counties with higher percentages of non-Hispanic Blacks and individuals living below the poverty line had a lower probability of coverage, whereas counties with higher percentages of Hispanics/Latinxs and individuals with a college degree had a higher probability of coverage. Tobacco 21 coverage also varied by region, with far greater coverage in the Northeast than in the Midwest and South. Conclusions: The national Tobacco 21 law may address disparities in coverage by SES, race/ethnicity, and region that could have lasting implications with regard to health equity. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available