4.5 Article

An Improvised Pulmonary Telerehabilitation Program for Postacute COVID-19 Patients Would Be Feasible and Acceptable in a Low-Resource Setting

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001666

Keywords

COVID-19; Physiotherapy; Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Telerehabilitation; Low-Resource Setting

Funding

  1. NIHR [221465/Z/20/Z]
  2. Wellcome [221465/Z/20/Z, 220757/Z/20/Z]
  3. UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office [220757/Z/20/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [220757/Z/20/Z, 221465/Z/20/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postacute COVID-19 patients are at risk of long-term functional impairment, and an improvised pulmonary telerehabilitation program in a low-resource setting has shown feasibility and acceptability. This approach can help reduce transmission risk and decrease the use of personal protective equipment.
Postacute COVID-19 patients are at risk of long-term functional impairment, and the rehabilitation community is calling for action preparing for a tsunami of rehabilitation needs in this patient population. In the absence of standard guidelines and local evidence, a 3-wk pulmonary telerehabilitation program was successfully delivered to a postacute severe COVID-19 patient in Malawi. The patient experienced persistent dyspnea and fatigue, with a remarkable impact on his health status. On the final assessment, all his respiratory severity scores had fallen by more than their thresholds for clinical significance. He reported no continued or new complaints, was walking longer distances, had returned to work, and was discharged from follow-up. Our case shows that an improvised pulmonary telerehabilitation program for postacute COVID-19 patients could be feasible and acceptable in a low-resource setting. Benefits include reducing risk of transmission and use of personal protective equipment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available