4.7 Article

Qualitative extension of the EC′ Zone Diagram to a molecular catalyst for a multi-electron, multi-substrate electrochemical reaction

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 45, Issue 24, Pages 9970-9976

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6dt00302h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  2. North Carolina American Chemical Society
  3. Department of Energy Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program (DOE SCGF)
  4. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act [DE-AC05-06OR23100]
  5. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The EC' Zone Diagram, introduced by Saveant and Su over 30 years ago, has been used to classify voltammetric responses for electrocatalytic systems. With a single H-2-evolving catalyst, Co(dmgBF(2))(2)(CH3CH)(2) (dmgBF(2) = difluoroboryl-dimethylglyoxime), and a series of para-substituted anilinium acids, experimental conditions were carefully tuned to access to each region of the classic zone diagram. Close scrutiny revealed the extent to which the kinetic (lambda) and excess (gamma) factors could be experimentally controlled and used to access a variety of waveforms for this ECEC' catalytic system. It was found that most of the tunable experimental parameters (such as catalyst concentration, scan rate, and substrate concentration) predicted in the EC' Zone Diagram could be extended to a multi-electron system and produced similarly-shaped waveforms with some deviations. Tuning of a single catalyst across every region of the classic zone diagram has previously been prevented due to the seven orders of magnitude that need to be traversed across the kinetic parameter; however, the cobalt catalyst in this study provided unique control of this parameter. By varying the acids used as the proton source, the rate constants for protonation were tuned via a pK(a)-dependent linear free energy relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available