4.2 Article

The Why of Drinking Matters: A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Drinking Motives and Drinking Outcomes

Journal

ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 38-50

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.14518

Keywords

Problem Drinking; Alcohol Use Disorder; Drinking to Cope; Drinking to Enhance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that enhancement and coping motives were the strongest predictors of drinking problems, while only enhancement motives were the strongest predictor of alcohol use. Enhancement and social motives were indirectly associated with alcohol use through drinking problems, and with drinking problems through alcohol use, while coping motives were only indirectly associated with alcohol use through drinking problems, with differing results for cross-sectional and longitudinal data.
Background Knowledge of how drinking motives are differentially associated with alcohol use (e.g., frequency, quantity) and drinking problems is critical in understanding risky drinking and the development of alcohol use disorder. The purpose of this paper was to use meta-analytic techniques to answer 2 overarching questions: (a) Which types of drinking motives (i.e., enhancement, coping, social, conformity) are most strongly associated with alcohol use and drinking problems? and (b) What are the most likely mechanisms (alcohol use or drinking problems) through which motives may be indirectly associated with outcomes? Method A comprehensive literature search identified 229 studies that met inclusion criteria (254 samples; N = 130,705) with a subset containing longitudinal data (k = 5; N = 6283). Data were analyzed using 2-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Results Results showed that both enhancement and coping motives were the strongest predictors of drinking problems, but only enhancement motives were the strongest predictor of alcohol use. Enhancement and social motives were indirectly associated with alcohol use through drinking problems and with drinking problems through alcohol use, whereas coping motives were only indirectly associated with alcohol use through drinking problems, although the results differed for cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Conclusion Overall, findings from this meta-analysis provide evidence that drinking motives differentially predict alcohol use outcomes through unique direct and indirect pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available