4.4 Article

Interactive digital interventions for prevention of sexually transmitted HIV

Journal

AIDS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 643-653

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002780

Keywords

behavior change; digital health; eHealth; HIV; meta-analysis; sexually transmitted infection; systematic review

Funding

  1. NIHR Public Health Research Programme [11/3009]
  2. MRC [G0701749] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that interactive digital interventions have positive effects on knowledge, intention, and HIV prevention behaviors. IDIs are appropriate for HIV prevention in a variety of settings.
Background: Digital technology offers good opportunities for HIV prevention. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of interactive digital interventions (IDIs) for prevention of sexually transmitted HIV. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IDIs for HIV prevention, defining `interactive' as producing personally tailored material. We searched databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, grey literature, reference lists, and contacted authors if needed. Two authors screened abstracts, applied eligibility and quality criteria and extracted data. Meta-analyses used random-effects models with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes, assessing heterogeneity using the I-2 statistic. Results: We included 31 RCTs of IDIs for HIV prevention. Meta-analyses of 29 RCTs comparing IDIs with minimal interventions (e.g. leaflet, waiting list) showed a moderate increase in knowledge (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80), no effect on self-efficacy (SMD 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.27), a small improvement in intention (SMD 0.16, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.26), improvement in HIV prevention behaviours (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.57) and a possible increase in viral load, but this finding is unreliable. We found no evidence of difference between IDIs and face-to-face interventions for knowledge, self-efficacy, intention, or HIV-related behaviours in meta-analyses of five small RCTs. We found no health economic studies. Conclusion: There is good evidence that IDIs have positive effects on knowledge, intention and HIV prevention behaviours. IDIs are appropriate for HIV prevention in a variety of settings. Copyright (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available