4.7 Article

STOPPFall(Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk): a Delphi study by the EuGMS Task and Finish Group on Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 1189-1199

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa249

Keywords

accidental falls; fall-risk-increasing drugs; deprescribing; aged; adverse effects; older people

Funding

  1. Amsterdam Public Health Aging and Later Life Innovation Price and Clementine Brigitta Maria Dalderup fund
  2. Amsterdam University fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Healthcare professionals are often reluctant to deprescribe fall-risk-increasing drugs, leading to the development of STOPPFall and a deprescribing tool by a European expert group. Through an expert Delphi consensus process, 14 medication classes were included in STOPPFall, with practical deprescribing guidance developed for these classes. Evaluation of the effectiveness of these tools in falls prevention is recommended.
Background: Healthcare professionals are often reluctant to deprescribe fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs). Lack of knowledge and skills form a significant barrier and furthermore, there is no consensus on which medications are considered as FRIDs despite several systematic reviews. To support clinicians in the management of FRIDs and to facilitate the deprescribing process, STOPPFall (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk) and a deprescribing tool were developed by a European expert group. Methods: STOPPFall was created by two facilitators based on evidence from recent meta-analyses and national fall prevention guidelines in Europe. Twenty-four panellists chose their level of agreement on a Likert scale with the items in the STOPPFall in three Delphi panel rounds. A threshold of 70% was selected for consensus a priori. The panellists were asked whether some agents are more fall-risk-increasing than others within the same pharmacological class. In an additional questionnaire, panellists were asked in which cases deprescribing of FRIDs should be considered and how it should be performed. Results: The panellists agreed on 14 medication classes to be included in the STOPPFall. They were mostly psychotropic medications. The panellists indicated 18 differences between pharmacological subclasses with regard to fall-risk-increasing properties. Practical deprescribing guidance was developed for STOPPFall medication classes. Conclusion: STOPPFall was created using an expert Delphi consensus process and combined with a practical deprescribing tool designed to optimise medication review. The effectiveness of these tools in falls prevention should be further evaluated in intervention studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available