4.5 Article

Inside-out: normalising practice-based IPE

Journal

ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 653-666

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-020-10017-8

Keywords

Interprofessional education; Practice-based; Normalisation Process Theory

Funding

  1. School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Practice-based interprofessional education (IPE), important for developing a collaboration-ready workforce, is not well integrated into healthcare curriculums. Strategic planning and building partnerships are essential in promoting sustainable practice-based IPE, benefiting students, patients, and the overall healthcare service.
Practice-based interprofessional education (IPE), a key feature in developing a collaboration-ready workforce, is poorly integrated in healthcare curriculums. This study aimed to synthesise educator perspectives on implementing practice-based IPE and develop recommendations to inform sustainable practice-based IPE. An ethnographic case study was carried out at a school of allied health. Data collection involved six observations, 11 interviews and a review of eight documents. Reflexive thematic analysis, informed by Normalisation Process Theory, established two key themes. First, we found that strategic planning is needed, with a coherent implementation agenda and planned reflection on activities. Second, building partnerships with placement partners was identified as essential. This can be achieved by supporting and championing practice-based IPE activities developed by placement sites and establishing how university and clinical educators can work collaboratively to deliver sustainable practice-based IPE. These conditions create a favourable environment for normalising practice-based IPE in healthcare curriculums, benefitting students, patients, and the overall healthcare service.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available