4.3 Article

Multiple Oracle consensus for weakly supervised defect detection in concrete structures using audio data

Journal

ADVANCED ROBOTICS
Volume 35, Issue 3-4, Pages 219-227

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2020.1861977

Keywords

Weak supervision; clustering; consensus building; defect detection; infrastructure inspection

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [KAKENHI 19J12391]
  2. (Japan Construction Information Center (JACIC)) foundation
  3. Satomi scholarship foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a framework for weakly supervised defect detection in concrete structures, aiming to address the inspection of critical social infrastructures mainly made of concrete. The framework involves a consensus between multiple humans providing weak supervision to compensate for individual shortcomings, resulting in improved performance and robustness to erroneous weak supervision. Experiments conducted with concrete test blocks in laboratory conditions demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Inspection of critical social infrastructures, which are mainly made of concrete, is a pressing issue. Weakly supervised methods are interesting for such critical tasks because they allow a unique mix of human involvement and automation. However, humans can make mistakes, resulting in the system being misled. In the present paper is proposed a framework for weakly supervised defect detection in concrete structures involving a consensus between several humans providing weak supervision. This allows to compensate for the shortcomings of each individual human and, therefore, yield better performance along with robustness to erroneous weak supervision. Experiments conducted with concrete test blocks in laboratory conditions showed the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available