4.7 Article

The hydrodynamics of liquid-solid and gas-liquid-solid inverse fluidized beds with bioparticles

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 254-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.006

Keywords

(Gas)-liquid-solid inverse fluidized bed; Bioparticle; Hydrodynamic; Minimum fluidization velocity; Bed expansion

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the hydrodynamic characteristics of liquid-solid and gas-liquid-solid inverse fluidized beds with bare particles and particles with biofilm. The presence of biofilm was found to increase the fluidizability of the bed layers, suggesting an improvement in the fluidization behavior.
The hydrodynamic characteristics, such as minimum fluidization velocity (Ulmf for liquid-solid (LS) system and Ug,if for gas-liquid-solid (GLS) system) and bed expansion ratio (BER), of liquid-solid and gasliquid-solid inverse fluidized beds (LSIFB and GLSIFB) with bare particles and particles with biofilm were investigated. In the LSIFB system, Ulmf and BER of the bare particles were independent of the solids loading. For bioparticles, the increase of the biofilm thickness reduced Ulmf and increased BER, suggesting that the fluidizability increases with the presence of the biofilm. In the GLSIFB system, the initial fluidization gas velocity (Ug,if) and the complete fluidization gas velocity (Ug,cf) both increased with increasing particle diameter and decreasing particle density under fixed superficial liquid velocities. Biofilm attachment led to a decrease of both Ug,if and Ug,cf, and an increase of bed expansion, again suggesting increased fluidizability with the presence of biofilm. (c) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available