4.7 Article

Cube-like mixed-phases TiO2 mesocrystalline hollow boxes from in situ topotactic transformation for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 186-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2020.11.027

Keywords

Titanium dioxide; Hollow structure; Mesocrystals; Light scattering; Dye-sensitized solar cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21965013]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province [2020RC112]
  3. Science and Research Key Project of Universities of Hainan Province [HNky2019ZD-16]
  4. Graduate Student Research and Innovation Program of Hainan Province [hsyx2019-17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cube-like TiO2 mesocrystalline hollow boxes fabricated by a topotactic transformation method exhibit excellent light scattering performance and efficient electron transport, leading to a significant improvement in the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.
The cube-like TiO2 mesocrystalline hollow boxes (TiO2-MHBs) are fabricated by a topotactic transformation method. TiO2-MHBs consist of one-dimensional nanorod-like rutile TiO2 combined with anatase TiO2. The ordering of TiO2-MHBs is in favor of efficient electron transport. TiO2-MHBs with mesoporous structure show excellent light scattering performance. Dye-sensitized solar cell with TiO2-MHBs light scattering overlayer exhibits an 18.3% increment of cell efficiency (9.51%) compared with the TiO2 nanoparticles film cell (8.04%). The improved photovoltaic performance is attributed to its unique crystallographic property and highly porous structure, which can enhance light scattering capability, quicken electron transport and electrolyte diffusion, and reduce charge recombination. (c) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available