4.6 Article

Effect of Nb or Ta Interlayer on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Graphite/Ti6Al4V Alloy Joints

Journal

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202001237

Keywords

brazing; interlayer; joining; microstructure; refractory metal

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304148]
  2. Wuhan Institute of Technology [CX2019057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using refractory metal interlayers, higher joint strength can be achieved, which benefits joint stress relaxation. The formation of (Ti, R) solid solution in the filler layers, with Nb or Ta atoms diffusing and dissolving into the fillers.
Graphite/Ti6Al4V (TC4) joining has been conducted with Cu-Ti-Ni filler and refractory metal (Nb or Ta) interlayer. Microstructural characterizations reveal that defect-free interfaces are obtained among the refractory metal interlayer, fillers, and substrates, suggesting favorable interfacial bonding in the joints. The diffusion and dissolution of Nb or Ta atoms into the molten fillers occur during joining, leading to the formation of (Ti, R) solid solution ([Ti, R]ss, R = Nb, or Ta) in the filler layers and thickness decrease in the interlayer. Two filler layers adjacent to the interlayer primarily consist of Ti-Cu, Ti-Cu-Ni intermetallics, and (Ti, R)ss. A Ti-rich diffusion layer and a thin TiC-containing layer exist near TC4 and graphite substrates, respectively. The joints brazed with Nb and Ta interlayers exhibit shear strength of 2 1.0 +/- 2.7 MPa and 20.2 +/- 3.1 MPa, respectively, both higher than those without interlayer, implying that the introduction of refractory metal interlayer may benefit the joint stress relaxation by its intermediate coefficient of thermal expansion and high ductility. The joint strength with Nb interlayer is slightly higher than that with Ta interlayer, mainly attributed to the relatively lower elastic modules and yield strength of Nb.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available