4.5 Review

Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID-19

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages 914-921

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15673

Keywords

coronavirus; fatigue; heart problems; long COVID; pandemic; school attendance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the persistent symptoms in five Swedish children post-COVID-19, indicating a lack of pediatric data on long COVID. Similarly to adults, children may also experience symptoms of long COVID with females potentially being more affected.
Aim: Persistent symptoms in adults after COVID-19 are emerging and the term long COVID is increasingly appearing in the literature. However, paediatric data are scarce. Methods: This paper contains a case report of five Swedish children and the long-term symptoms reported by their parents. It also includes a systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases and the medRxiv/bioRxiv pre-print servers up to 2 November 2020. Results: The five children with potential long COVID had a median age of 12 years (range 9-15) and four were girls. They had symptoms for 6-8 months after their clinical diagnoses of COVID-19. None were hospitalised at diagnosis, but one was later admitted for peri-myocarditis. All five children had fatigue, dyspnoea, heart palpitations or chest pain, and four had headaches, difficulties concentrating, muscle weakness, dizziness and sore throats. Some had improved after 6-8 months, but they all suffered from fatigue and none had fully returned to school. The systematic review identified 179 publications and 19 of these were deemed relevant and read in detail. None contained any information on long COVID in children. Conclusion: Children may experience similar long COVID symptoms to adults and females may be more affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available