4.7 Article

Evolution of dislocation and twin densities in a Mg alloy at quasi-static and high strain rates

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages 102-113

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.082

Keywords

Mg alloys; strain rate; twinning; dislocation density; Hopkinson tensile bar

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0209900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51625402, U1764252]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [R706 6-18, 17210418]
  4. Seed Funding for Basic Research of HKU [201811159041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work, for the first time, quantitatively studies the evolution of both dislocations and deformation twins with various strain rates in an ATZ311 Mg alloy. Interrupted tensile tests were performed at the strain rates of 0.001, 1 and 600 s(-1). Deformation twins were characterized by microscopy techniques and evaluated using the fractions of twin boundaries and twinned area. The average dislocation density and the relative fractions of dislocations with different Burgers vectors were determined from neutron diffraction data. It was found that the twin fraction increases remarkably and becomes saturated at lower strain rates (0.001-1 s(-1)), while the dislocation density only obtains an obvious enhancement at a much higher strain rate (600 s(-1)). Besides, the distinctively high flow stress at high strain rate leads to a substantial increase in the density of the hard-to-activate < c + a >-type dislocations, after the < a >-type dislocation density reaches rapidly its saturated value at a small strain level. The twinning modes with opposite polarities are able to coexist in the same grains because of the high local stress concentration at strain rates above 1 s(-1). (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available