4.2 Article

Serum NETosis expression and recurrence risk after regional or volatile anaesthesia during breast cancer surgery: A pilot, prospective, randomised single-blind clinical trial

Journal

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 313-319

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aas.13745

Keywords

anaesthesiology; anaesthesiology; breast cancer; cancer; general; metastasis; neutrophil extracellular trapping; regional

Categories

Funding

  1. College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland (CAI) research scholarship 2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the choice of two different anaesthetic techniques did not impact the expression of NETosis in breast cancer patients, indicating that it is not a viable marker to assess the effect of anaesthetic technique on breast cancer recurrence.
Background Some experimental and retrospective clinical studies signal an association between certain anaesthetic techniques and tumour metastasis following breast cancer surgery. Neutrophil Extracellular Trapping (NETosis) is an immunological process, whereby neutrophils engulf tumour antigen then degranulate, leaving a serologic marker. NETosis expression among breast cancer patients is associated with an increased risk of metastasis. We investigated the effect of two distinct anaesthetic techniques on the expression of NETosis in women who underwent potentially curative breast cancer surgery. Methods In a parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, a subset of women (n = 40) undergoing breast cancer resection surgery, who were partaking in a larger trial (NCT00418457), were randomly assigned to receive volatile general anaesthesia (GA) or propofol GA combined with paravertebral regional anaesthesia (PPA) for their surgery. Serum was taken and stored before and 24 hours post-operatively. NETosis was measured by ELISA using Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit) biomarkers, which were the co-primary end points. Results Patient and breast cancer characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Recurrence occurred in 7.5% patients. GA patients received more opioids and reported higher post-operative pain than PPA. There was no difference in post-operative MPO in GA vs PPA (10.5 +/- 6.6 vs 11.5 +/- 4.7 ng mL(-1), P = .60). Regarding CitH3, there was no difference post-operatively in GA vs PPA (3.6 +/- 2.3 vs 4.0 +/- 5.9, P = .80). NET expression did not differ before or after anaesthesia and surgery in either group, for either biomarker. Conclusion Anaesthetic technique did not affect NETosis expression in breast cancer patients, indicating that it is not a viable marker of the effect of anaesthetic technique on breast cancer recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available