4.6 Article

Comparison of N-Acetyl-Glucosamine to Other Monosaccharides Reveals Structural Differences for the Inhibition of α-Synuclein Aggregation

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 14-19

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00716

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM114537]
  2. Anton Burg Foundation
  3. NIGMS [T32GM118289]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that different sugars have varying effects on inhibiting amyloid formation, despite their structures having only small differences. This suggests the need for further investigation into the exact mechanism of amyloid inhibition by O-GlcNAc.
O-GlcNAc modification of the microtubule associated protein tau and alpha-synuclein can directly inhibit the formation of the associated amyloid fibers associated with major classes of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the mechanism(s) by which this posttranslational modification (PTM) inhibit amyloid aggregation are still murky. One hypothesis is that O-GlcNAc simply acts as a polyhydroxylated steric impediment to the formation of amyloid oligomers and fibers. Here, we begin to test this hypothesis by comparing the effects of O-GlcNAc to other similar monosaccharides-glucose, N-acetyl-galactosamine (Gal-NAc), or mannose-on alpha-synuclein amyloid formation. Interestingly, we find that this quite reasonable hypothesis is not entirely correct. More specifically, we used four types of biochemical and biophysical assays to discover that the different sugars display different effects on the inhibition of amyloid formation, despite only small differences between the structures of the monosaccharides. These results further support a more detailed investigation into the mechanism of amyloid inhibition by O-GlcNAc and has potential implications for the evolution of N-acetyl-glucosamine as the monosaccharide of choice for widespread intracellular glycosylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available