4.8 Article

Infiltrated Ni0.08Co0.02Ce0.02CeO2-x@Ni0.8Co0.2 Catalysts for a Finger-Like Anode in Direct Methane-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 4943-4954

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c17339

Keywords

solid oxide fuel cell; methane fuel; carbon deposition; oxygen species; reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0402800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872276]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK340000004]
  4. Key Program of Research and Development of Hefei Science Center CAS [2018HSC-KPRD002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully addresses the challenges encountered in the direct utilization of methane in solid oxide fuel cells through the improvement of anode materials and catalysts, achieving excellent performance.
Direct utilization of methane in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is greatly impeded by the grievous carbon deposition and the much depressed catalytic activity. In this work, a promising anode, taking finger-like porous YSZ as the anode substrate and impregnated Ni0.08Co0.02Ce0.9O2-delta@Ni0.8Co0.2O as the novel catalyst, is fabricated via the phase conversion-combined tape-casting technique. This anode shows commendable mechanical strength and excellent catalytic activity and stability toward the methane conversion reactions, which is attributed to the exsolved alloy nanoparticles and the active oxygen species on the reduced Ni 0.08 Ni0.08Co0.02Ce0.9O2-delta catalyst as well as the facilitated methane transport rooting in the special open-pore microstructure of the anode substrate. Strikingly, this button cell delivers an excellent peak power density of 730 mW cm(-2) at 800 degrees C in 97% CH4/3% H2O fuel, only 9% lower than that in 97% H-2/3% H2O. Our work shed new light on the SOFC anode developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available