4.5 Review

Multivariable risk scores for predicting short-term outcomes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope: A systematic review

Journal

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 502-510

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14203

Keywords

syncope predictors; syncope risk scores; syncope risk stratification; syncope outcomes; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviewed the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of adverse events within 30 days, finding that the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) performed well in this regard. However, other risk scores lacked validation or sufficient accuracy.
Objectives Emergency department (ED) patients with unexplained syncope are at risk of experiencing an adverse event within 30 days. Our objective was to systematically review the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of an adverse event over the next 30 days. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) from database creation until May 2020. We sought studies evaluating prediction scores of adults presenting to an ED with syncope. We included studies that followed patients for up to 30 days to identify adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac surgery. We only included studies with a blinded comparison between baseline clinical features and adverse events. We calculated likelihood ratios and confidence intervals (CIs). Results We screened 13,788 abstracts. We included 17 studies evaluating nine risk stratification scores on 24,234 patient visits, where 7.5% (95% CI = 5.3% to 10%) experienced an adverse event. A Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) of 4 or more was associated with a high likelihood of an adverse event (LRscore >= 4 = 11, 95% CI = 8.9 to 14). A CSRS of 0 or less (LRscore <= 0 = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.20) was associated with a low likelihood of an adverse event. Other risk scores were not validated on an independent sample, had low positive likelihood ratios for identifying patients at high risk, or had high negative likelihood ratios for identifying patients at low risk. Conclusion Many risk stratification scores are not validated or not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. The CSRS is an accurate validated prediction score for ED patients with unexplained syncope. Its impact on clinical decision making, admission rates, cost, or outcomes of care is not known.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available