Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy
Arees Damani et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
High Chance of Late Recovery of Urinary and Erectile Function Beyond 12 Months After Radical Prostatectomy
Philipp Mandel et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial
Vladimir Student et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: Do patients return to baseline?
Mikkel Fode et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy
Serkan Deveci et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2016)
A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update
Jochen Walz et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study
John W. Yaxley et al.
LANCET (2016)
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
J. L. Donovan et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Differences in the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among Korean, Caucasian, and African American men: A retrospective cohort study of radical pro statectomy
In Gab Jeong et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2016)
Prostate cancer in men aged less than 50 years at diagnosis
N. J. Kinnear et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Degree of Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles During Radical Prostatectomy and Urinary Continence 1 Year after Surgery
Gunnar Steineck et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Impact of Age on Quality-of-life Outcomes After Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer
Lindsay A. Hampson et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial
Eva Haglind et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Counseling the Post-radical Prostatectomy Patients About Functional Recovery: High Predictiveness of Current Status
Andrew J. Vickers et al.
UROLOGY (2014)
Retrograde Versus Antegrade Nerve Sparing During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Is Better for Achieving Early Functional Recovery?
Young Hwii Ko et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2013)
Beyond the Learning Curve of the Retzius-sparing Approach for Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncologic and Functional Results of the First 200 Patients with ≥1 Year of Follow-up
Antonio Galfano et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2013)
Anatomic Grading of Nerve Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Oscar Schatloff et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2012)
Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
Ashutosh K. Tewari et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2011)
Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: How They Are Changing the Management of Prostate Cancer
Alessandro Sciarra et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2011)
Urology Group: Prostate Screening Should Be Offered Beginning at Age 40
Mike Mitka
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2009)
Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy
Sang Eun Lee et al.
UROLOGY (2007)
Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer
JT Wei et al.
UROLOGY (2000)