4.7 Article

Dynamics of thermally magnetized grooved flow field having uniformly heated circular cylinder: Finite element analysis

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100718

Keywords

Magnetized grooved channel; Heated rectangular ribs; Heated circular cylinder; Hydrodynamic forces

Categories

Funding

  1. King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia [R.G.P-2/29/41]
  2. United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE [31S363-UPAR (4) 2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper contains the untapped characteristics of the thermally magnetized grooved computational domain. To be more specific, in this paper the uniformly heated circular-shaped cylinder is placed fixed towards ongoing cold Newtonian fluid. Two uniformly heated rectangular ribs are installed to attain grooved geometry. Further, it is assumed that the cold fluid enters from an inlet of the channel with the parabolic velocity profile. The outlet of the channel is carried with Neumann condition. All other walls are taken with no-slip condition. The energy equation is incorporated to examine the heat transfer individualities. In this regard, the left wall is taken cold while the right wall is carried with an adiabatic condition. The whole physical design is translated in terms of partial differential equations and for solution purpose, the finite element method is utilized. For a better approximation, we have carried hybrid meshing. The outcomes are shared by way of contour plots and line graph study. The impact of the magnetized flow field and the heated rectangular ribs on hydrodynamic forces experienced by the circular obstacle is examined. The statistics for hydrodynamic forces in terms of lift and drag coefficients are offered up-to five different meshed levels. Such values are recorded by adopted line integration around the outer surface of the obstacle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available