Journal
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 1260-1267Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.004
Keywords
Augmented reality; Three-dimensional; reconstruction; Real-time guided surgery; Robot assisted radical; prostatectomy; Index lesion
Categories
Funding
- Technology Research Grant by Intuitive Surgical
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study evaluated the impact of AR-3D model in guiding nerve sparing during RARP surgery, showing that the technology improved real-time identification of index lesions and allowed for changes in the surgical plan in approximately one out of three cases, with an overall appropriateness of 94.4%.
Background: Augmented reality (AR) is a novel technology adopted in prostatic surgery. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a 3D model with AR (AR-3D model), to guide nerve sparing (NS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), on surgical planning. Design, Setting, and Participants: Twenty-six consecutive patients with diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results available were scheduled for AR-3D NS RARP. Intervention: Segmentation of mpMRI and creation of 3D virtual models were achieved. To develop AR guidance, the surgical DaVinci video stream was sent to an AR-dedicated personal computer, and the 3D virtual model was superimposed and manipulated in real time on the robotic console. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The concordance of localisation of the index lesion between the 3D model and the pathological specimen was evaluated using a prostate map of 32 specific areas. A preliminary surgical plan to determinate the extent of the NS approach was recorded based on mpMRI. The final surgical plan was reassessed during surgery by implementation of the AR-3D model guidance. Results and limitations: The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 15.4% in the overall patient population; three patients (11.5%) had PSMs at the level of the index lesion. AR -3D technology changed the NS surgical plan in 38.5% of men on patient-based and in 34.6% of sides on side-based analysis, resulting in overall appropriateness of 94.4%. The 3D model revealed 70%, 100%, and 92% of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respec-tively, at the 32-area map analysis. Conclusions: AR-3D guided surgery is useful for improving the real-time identification of the index lesion and allows changing of the NS approach in approximately one out of three cases, with overall appropriateness of 94.4%.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available