4.7 Article

Design of Perovskite Thermally Co-Evaporated Highly Efficient Mini-Modules with High Geometrical Fill Factors

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000473

Keywords

co-evaporated perovskites; laser etching; MAPbI(3); perovskite mini-modules; perovskite solar cells

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Energy Innovation Research Program [NRF2015EWT-EIRP003-004, NRF-CRP14-2014-03, Solar CRP: S18-1176-SCRP]
  2. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Intra-CREATE Collaborative Grant [NRF2018- ITC001-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as a promising technology for next-generation photovoltaics thanks to their high power-conversion-efficiency (PCE). Scaling up PSCs using industrially compatible processes is a key requirement to make them suitable for a variety of applications. Herein, large-area PSCs and perovskite solar modules (PSMs) are developed based on co-evaporated MAPbI(3)using optimized structures and active area designs to enhance PCEs and geometrical fill factors (GFFs). Small-area co-evaporated PSCs (0.16 cm(2)) achieve PCE over 19%. When the PSCs are scaled-up, the thin films high quality allows them to maintain consistentV(oc)andJ(sc), while their fill factors (FF), which depend on the substrate sheet resistance, are substantially compromised. However, PSCs with active areas from 1.4 to 7 cm(2)show a substantially improved FF when rectangular designs with optimized length to width ratios are used. Reasoning these results in the PSM design with optimal subcell size and for specific dead areas, a 6.4 cm(2)PSM is demonstrated with a record 18.4% PCE and a GFF of approximate to 91%. Combining the high uniformity of the co-evaporation deposition with active areas design, it is possible to scale up 40 times the PSCs with PCE losses smaller than 0.7% (absolute value).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available