4.4 Review

Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: A systematic review

Journal

PULMONOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 219-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.03.003

Keywords

Maximal respiratory pressures; Respiratory function tests; Healthy adults; Standardization; Procedures

Funding

  1. Programa Operacional de Competitividade e Internacionalizacao - POCI, through Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional - FEDER [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007628, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028806]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PTDC/DTP-PIC/2284/2014, PTDC/SAU-SER/28806/2017, UID/BIM/04501/2019]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/DTP-PIC/2284/2014, PTDC/SAU-SER/28806/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed predictive equations for maximum inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures in adults, finding that most equations were developed from unstandardized procedures. Future research should further explore the applicability of these equations and develop new ones for populations where specific equations are not available.
Background: Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods: A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results: Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions: This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary. ? 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier Espan?a, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available