4.5 Article

Limnological Characteristics and Diatom Dominants in Lakes of Northeastern Poland

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d12100374

Keywords

lakes; disharmonic lakes; diatoms; dominance index; peat bogs; Wigry National Park; Poland

Funding

  1. Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences (Krakow, Poland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determination of the relationships between environmental factors and diatom assemblages is usually made for several hundred lakes spread over a large area. However, the analysis of several lakes located near Lake Wigry also gives interesting results. Lakes in Wigry National Park (Poland) with broad similarity of geological origin show clear limnological, physical, and chemical differences. Here, we report on an investigation into how these dissimilarities influence diatom assemblages. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis showed that the studied lakes can be divided into three groups: (1) disharmonic, (2) harmonious with greater human impact on the environment, and (3) harmonious with a more limited human impact. The harmonious lakes could be divided into two groups that are mainly in line with the contents of the chloride and sulfates ions taken as indicative of human impacts on the environment. Overall, the three groups had different dominance structures, as reference to the Dominance Index (DI) made clear (mean values being: (1) -70.54%, (2) -72%, and (3) -54.58%, Generalized Linear Models with the categorical independent variable (group) showed significant differences between groups (for 1-3, 2-3) p value < 0.05). Lakes impacted by anthropopressure and disharmonic ones had the strongest dominance structure. More broadly, DI differences between the groups are consistent with the Species Pool Hypothesis (SPH), while studied differences can be said to result from natural geological dissimilarities, as well as disparate anthropogenic impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available