A comparative cost analysis of transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Despite proven clinical benefits in the short term, technical difficulties limit utilization of laparoscopy in rectal cancer surgery (RCS). Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) overcomes many technical limitations of laparoscopic RCS. However, the costs of this procedure have not been addressed yet. Our goal was to perform a comparative cost analysis of taTME and laparoscopic TME (lapTME). Consecutive patients undergoing curative TME between 1 February 2014 and 31 October 2018 were selected from a prospectively maintained database and stratified, according to the type of procedure, into taTME and lapTME groups. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. The main outcome measure was intraoperative costs of the two procedures. Secondary outcomes were short-term outcome and the utilization of hospital resources to manage the postoperative course. Hundred and fifty-two patients with rectal cancer (66 lapTME, 86 taTME) were included in the study. Surgical supplies required for taTME procedure exceeded the cost of lapTME of 754,54 euro. The duration of surgery was not significantly different between the two approaches (266 +/- 92.85 vs 271 +/- 83.63,p = 0.50). Short-term outcomes were comparable including postoperative complication rate (17 vs 20%,p = 0.68), reintervention rate, and length of stay. There was no difference in hospital resources utilization to manage postoperative course including blood test, diagnostics, consultations, and medications. TaTME has higher intraoperative costs in terms of supplies with respect to lapTME. Short-term outcomes and hospital resources to manage postoperative course are comparable.

Automated summary

A comparative cost analysis of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) and laparoscopic TME (lapTME) in rectal cancer surgery found that taTME had higher intraoperative costs in terms of supplies compared to lapTME. However, the duration of surgery, short-term outcomes, and hospital resources utilization to manage the postoperative course were comparable between the two procedures.