4.6 Article

Solution-Processed Synthesis of Copper Oxide (CuxO) Thin Films for Efficient Photocatalytic Solar Water Splitting

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 5, Issue 39, Pages 25125-25134

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02754

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Faculty of Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh [A-1205/5/52/RU/F.ENG.-06/2019-2020]
  2. ICT Division, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and IT, Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports a solution-processed synthesis of copper oxide (CuxO) to be used as a potential photocathode for solar hydrogen production in the solar water-splitting system. CuxO thin films were synthesized through the reduction of copper iodide (CuI) thin films by sodium hydroxide (NaOH), which were deposited by the spin coating method from CuI solution in a polar aprotic solvent (acetonitrile). The phase and crystalline quality of the synthesized CuxO thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures were investigated using various techniques. The X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy studies confirm the presence of Cu2O, CuO/Cu2O mixed phase, and pure CuO phase at annealing temperatures of 250, 300, and 350 degrees C, respectively. It is revealed from the experimental findings that the synthesized CuxO thin films with an annealing temperature of 350 degrees C possess the highest crystallinity, smooth surface morphology, and higher carrier density. The highest photocurrent density of -19.12 mA/cm(2) at -1 V versus RHE was achieved in the photoelectrochemical solar hydrogen production system with the use of the CuxO photocathode annealed at a temperature of 350 degrees C. Therefore, it can be concluded that CuxO synthesized by the spin coating method through the acetonitrile solvent route can be used as an efficient photocathode in the solar water-splitting system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available