4.7 Article

Self-Compatibility Not Associated with Morphological or Genetic Diversity Reduction in Oil-Rewarding Calceolaria Species

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants9101377

Keywords

Calceolaria; self-incompatibility; Chile; specialized pollination; floral morphology; plant reproduction

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300P3_151141, PBNEP3_140192]
  2. Fondecyt [PD3150267, 11170377, 1141047]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBNEP3_140192, P300P3_151141] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most common evolutionary transitions in angiosperms is the reproductive change from outcrossing to selfing, commonly associated with changes in floral biology and genetic diversity. Here, we aim to test whether self-compatibility leads to a reduction of floral traits and genetic diversity. For this, we experimentally estimate levels of self-compatibility, measure three floral traits and estimate four genetic diversity parameters using nine microsatellites in nine Calceolaria species. Our analysis indicated that four of the study species were self-incompatible. In addition, we found that self-compatible species did not show a reduction in floral traits size, but rather displayed larger corolla and elaiophore areas. Our analyses of genetic diversity identified larger allele number and observed heterozygosity in selfers than in outcrossers, but did not find larger inbreeding in the self-compatible species. Even though our results contradict our expectations, in the case of Calceolaria, their high dependence on only two genera of oil-bees puts the genus in a vulnerable reproductive position, probably facilitating the evolution of reproductive assurance mechanisms in the absence of pollinators. As a result, plants maintain their pollinator attraction traits while evolving the ability to self, possibly in a delayed way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available