4.5 Article

Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients

Journal

EYE AND VISION
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1

Keywords

Down syndrome; Keratoconus; Diagnostic criteria; Tomography; Discriminant analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgerate, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS). Methods In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses. Results Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 mu m, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 mu m, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (allP > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff <= 480.0 mu m, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff <= 55.3 mu m, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (allP > 0.05). Conclusions In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available