4.6 Article

Novel Biomarkers to Distinguish between Type 3c and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Untargeted Metabolomics

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10110423

Keywords

metabolomics; untargeted LC-HRMS; diagnosis; pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus; type 2 diabetes mellitus; chronic pancreatitis; biomarker

Funding

  1. JUNTA DE ANDALUCIA [PIN-0474-2016, PC-0549-2017, PC-0498-2017]
  2. INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III [DTS17/00081]
  3. Fundacion MEDINA, a public-private partnership of Merck Sharp and Dohme de Espana S.A./Universidad de Granada/Junta de Andalucia [PIN-0474-2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (T3cDM) is a highly frequent complication of pancreatic disease, especially chronic pancreatitis, and it is often misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A correct diagnosis allows the appropriate treatment of these patients, improving their quality of life, and various technologies have been employed over recent years to search for specific biomarkers of each disease. The main aim of this metabolomic project was to find differential metabolites between T3cDM and T2DM. Reverse-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry was performed in serum samples from patients with T3cDM and T2DM. Multivariate Principal Component and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant analyses were employed to evaluate between-group variations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify potential candidates and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to evaluate their diagnostic value. A panel of five differential metabolites obtained an area under the ROC curve of 0.946. In this study, we demonstrate the usefulness of untargeted metabolomics for the differential diagnosis between T3cDM and T2DM and propose a panel of five metabolites that appear altered in the comparison between patients with these diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available