4.8 Article

Heterogeneous sensing and scientific machine learning for quality assurance in laser powder bed fusion - A single-track study

Journal

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101659

Keywords

Laser powder bed fusion; In-Situ quality monitoring; Process-mapping; Scientific machine learning; Sensor fusion

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07-NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-808643]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1719388, CMMI-1739696, CMMI-1752069, OIA-1929172]
  3. NSF
  4. CMMI Data Science Activities
  5. NSF INTERN Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is the predominant metal additive manufacturing technique that benefits from a significant body of academic study and industrial investment given its ability to create complex geometry parts. Despite LPBF's widespread use, there still exists a need for process monitoring to ensure reliable part production and reduce post-build quality assessments. Towards this end, we develop and evaluate machine learning-based predictive models using height map-derived quality metrics for single tracks and the accompanying pyrometer and high-speed video camera data collected under a wide range of laser power and laser velocity settings. We extract physically intuitive low-level features representative of the meltpool dynamics from these sensing modalities and explore how these vary with the linear energy density. We find our Sequential Decision Analysis Neural Network (SeDANN) model - a scientific machine learning model that incorporates physical process insights - outperforms other purely data-driven black box models in both accuracy and speed. The general approach to data curation and adaptable nature of SeDANN's scientifically informed architecture should benefit LPBF systems with an evolving suite of sensing modalities and post-build quality measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available