4.7 Article

Infants relax in response to unfamiliar foreign lullabies

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 256-264

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00963-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Director's Early Independence Award [DP5OD024566]
  2. Harvard University Department of Psychology
  3. Harvard Data Science Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infants have been shown to relax in response to unfamiliar lullabies, suggesting that they may be predisposed to respond to common features of lullabies found in different cultures, rather than being influenced by musical experiences.
Music is characterized by acoustic forms that are predictive of its behavioural functions. For example, adult listeners accurately identify unfamiliar lullabies as infant-directed on the basis of their musical features alone. This property could reflect a function of listeners' experiences, the basic design of the human mind, or both. Here, we show that US infants (N= 144) relax in response to eight unfamiliar foreign lullabies, relative to matched non-lullaby songs from other foreign societies, as indexed by heart rate, pupillometry and electrodermal activity. They do so consistently throughout the first year of life, suggesting that the response is not a function of their musical experiences, which are limited relative to those of adults. The infants' parents overwhelmingly chose lullabies as the songs that they would use to calm their fussy infant, despite their unfamiliarity. Together, these findings suggest that infants may be predisposed to respond to common features of lullabies found in different cultures. Infants listened to lullabies and other songs recorded in cultures and languages that were unfamiliar to them. They relaxed more in response to the lullabies. This suggests that infants may be predisposed to respond to common features of lullabies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available