4.6 Article

AND-gate contrast agents for enhanced fluorescence-guided surgery

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 264-277

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-00616-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 EB026285]
  2. Stanford Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program seed grant
  3. American Cancer Society-Grand View League Research Funding Initiative Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF-19-105-01-CCE]
  4. DFG Research Fellowship [TH2139/1-1]
  5. Stanford ChEM-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training Program
  6. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Grant [DGE-114747]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of AND-gate optical imaging probes that rely on multiple tumour-specific enzymes to produce fluorescent signals has shown significantly improved specificity and sensitivity to tumour tissue, offering promising applications in disease detection and treatment.
Surgical resection of tumours requires precisely locating and defining the margins between lesions and normal tissue. However, this is made difficult by irregular margin borders. Although molecularly targeted optical contrast agents can be used to define tumour margins during surgery in real time, the selectivity of the contrast agents is often limited by the target being expressed in both healthy and tumour tissues. Here, we show that AND-gate optical imaging probes that require the processing of two substrates by multiple tumour-specific enzymes produce a fluorescent signal with significantly improved specificity and sensitivity to tumour tissue. We evaluated the performance of the probes in mouse models of mammary tumours and of metastatic lung cancer, as well as during fluorescence-guided robotic surgery. Imaging probes that rely on multivariate activation to selectively target complex patterns of enzymatic activity should be useful in disease detection, treatment and monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available