4.0 Article

Associations between cumulative environmental quality and ten selected birth defects in Texas

Journal

BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 161-172

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1788

Keywords

air; birth defects; environmental quality; sociodemographic; water

Funding

  1. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) [EP-17-D-000079, EP09D000003, EP12D000264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found positive associations between environmental quality and neural tube defects, oral clefts, etc., but limited to no association with limb reduction defects. The sociodemographic domain showed the strongest positive associations with birth defects.
Background Causes of most birth defects are largely unknown. Genetics, maternal factors (e.g., age, smoking) and environmental exposures have all been linked to some birth defects, including neural tube, oral cleft, limb reduction, and gastroschisis; however, the contribution of cumulative exposures across several environmental domains in association with these defects is not well understood. Methods The Environmental Quality Index (EQI) and its domains (air, water, land, sociodemographic, built) were used to estimate county-level cumulative environmental exposures from 2006-2010 and matched to birth defects identified from Texas Birth Defects Registry and live birth records from births in years 2007-2010 (N= 1,610,709). Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between 10 birth defects and the EQI. Results We observed some positive associations between worst environmental quality and neural tube, anencephaly, spina bifida, oral cleft, cleft palate, cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and gastroschisis [PR range: 1.12-1.55], but near null associations with limb reduction defects. Among domain specific results, we observed the strongest positive associations with the sociodemographic domain across birth defects but varied positive associations among the air and water domains, and negative or null associations with the land and built domains. Overall, few exposure-response patterns were evident. Conclusions Our results highlight the complexities of cumulative, simultaneous environmental exposures in the prevalence rates of 10 selected birth defects. We were able to explore the impact of overall and domain specific environmental quality on birth defects and identify potential domain specific drivers of these associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available