4.3 Review

The Active Electrode in the Living Brain: The Response of the Brain Parenchyma to Chronically Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes

Journal

OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 131-140

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa326

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Glial scar; Electrode-tissue interface

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  2. European Regional Development Fund [13/RC/2073]
  3. European Research Council [ERC-2014-CoG-646923]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep brain stimulation is an established surgical therapy for Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders, but the response of tissue surrounding the implanted electrodes is complex and varies over time. Studies have shown an increase in electrode-tissue impedance in the weeks following implantation, stabilizing at several months. Lower impedance values are observed around stimulated electrodes, and there is evidence of altered neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation around these electrodes, indicating the importance of understanding the impact of stimulation on surrounding tissue for optimizing DBS efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation is an established symptomatic surgical therapy for Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and a number of other movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. The well-established foreign body response around implanted electrodes is marked by gliosis, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. However, how this response changes with the application of chronic stimulation is less well-understood. OBJECTIVE: To integrate the most recent evidence from basic science, patient, and postmortem studies on the effect of such an active electrode on the parenchyma of the living brain. METHODS: A thorough and in-part systematic literature review identified 49 papers. RESULTS: Increased electrode-tissue impedance is consistently observed in the weeks following electrode implantation, stabilizing at approximately 3 to 6mo. Lower impedance values are observed around stimulated implanted electrodes when compared with unstimulated electrodes. A temporary reduction in impedance has also been observed in response to stimulation in non human primates. Postmortem studies from patients confirm the presence of a fibrous sheath, astrocytosis, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammation in the immediate vicinity of the electrode. When comparing stimulated and unstimulated electrodes directly, there is some evidence across animal and patient studies of altered neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation around stimulated electrodes. CONCLUSION: Establishing how stimulation influences the electrical and histological properties of the surrounding tissue is critical in understanding how these factors contribute to DBS efficacy, and in controlling symptoms and side effects. Understanding these complex issues will aid in the development of future neuromodulation systems that are optimized for the tissue environment and required stimulation protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available