4.5 Article

Effective preparation of superhydrophilic-underwater superoleophobic nanoparticles/polymeric sponges for oil-water separation

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/ab9f56

Keywords

superhydrophilicity; underwater superoleophobicity; polymeric sponge; nanoparticles; surface modification; oil-water separation

Funding

  1. Guangdong province natural science foundation, China [2017A030313268, 2017A030313080]
  2. Innovation Team Research Project of Guangzhou Education, China [1201610010]
  3. College Student Training Program of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, China [733192, 733478]
  4. Special Innovation Project Foundation for Students of Guangdong Common University, China [PDJH2019b0327]
  5. professorial and doctoral scientific research foundation of Huizhou University, China [2018JB001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hierarchically-micro/nanoscale rough surface structure and the high surface hydrophilicity are two necessary factors to construct the superhydrophilic-underwater superoleophobic materials for oil-water separation. In this work, an effective method on the fabrication of the superhydrophilic-underwater superoleophobic sponges was developed, in which the mixture of the Fe(3)O(4)nanoparticles or (and) the SiO(2)nanoparticles, the chitosan, the polyvinyl alcohol, and the glutaraldehyde was coated on the polymeric sponge by dip-coating to obtain the surface-modified sponges possessing the rough superhydrophilic-underwater superoleophobic surface. The structure of the surface-modified sponges were investigated by TGA, FTIR, WAXD, XPS, SEM, two-dimensional EDS element mapping as well as VSM, and the underwater superoleophobicity of the surface-modified sponges was proved by CH(2)Cl(2)contact angle measurement. Furthermore, the resultant surface-modified sponges exhibited good oil-water separation ability by adsorption and filtration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available