4.5 Article

Adjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: approaching clinical practice consensus?

Journal

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 577-+

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.06.12

Keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma; adjuvant chemotherapy; survival; lymph node (LN); surgical procedures

Funding

  1. Institute of Basic and Applied Research in Surgery at the University of Minnesota
  2. VFW fund
  3. University of Minnesota Department of Surgery Cancer Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare with limited evidence-based guidelines. This retrospective study evaluates the use of chemotherapy in patients with resected ICC. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program database was used to identify patients with resected ICC. Patients were stratified by date of diagnosis (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014), T, and N stage. Multivariable logistic regression models identified predictors of chemotherapy use. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify survival trends. Results: One thousand and two hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy utilization increased over time (33% to 41%, P <= 0.05). Chemotherapy use increased in lymph node (LN) positive patients [32% to 60% in 2010-2014; (P <= 0.05) and T3/T4 disease (40% to 60% in 2010-2014; P <= 0.01], but not in patients with LN negative or T1/T2 disease. LN positivity was associated with utilization of chemotherapy in 2005-2009 and 2010-2014. Overall survival increased from 32 to 41 months (P <= 0.05). In LN positive patients, chemotherapy was associated with a decreased hazard ratio of death (P <= 0.05) and T3/ T4 disease was associated with an increased hazard ratio of death (P <= 0.05). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy use in ICC has increased. More LN positive or patients with T3/T4 tumors are receiving chemotherapy, which may explain the improvement in overall survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available