4.7 Article

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling Providing Insights into Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in Adults and Pediatric Patients

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12100908

Keywords

physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling; fentanyl; neonates; norfentanyl; pediatric scaling; drug-drug interaction (DDI); pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031L0153, 03XP0196]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
  3. Saarland University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fentanyl is widely used for analgesia, sedation, and anesthesia both in adult and pediatric populations. Yet, only few pharmacokinetic studies of fentanyl in pediatrics exist as conducting clinical trials in this population is especially challenging. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a mechanistic approach to explore drug pharmacokinetics and allows extrapolation from adult to pediatric populations based on age-related physiological differences. The aim of this study was to develop a PBPK model of fentanyl and norfentanyl for both adult and pediatric populations. The adult PBPK model was established in PK-Sim(R) using data from 16 clinical studies and was scaled to several pediatric subpopulations. similar to 93% of the predicted AUC(last) values in adults and similar to 88% in pediatrics were within 2-fold of the corresponding value observed. The adult PBPK model predicted a fraction of fentanyl dose metabolized to norfentanyl of similar to 33% and a fraction excreted in urine of similar to 7%. In addition, the pediatric PBPK model was used to simulate differences in peak plasma concentrations after bolus injections and short infusions. The novel PBPK models could be helpful to further investigate fentanyl pharmacokinetics in both adult and pediatric populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available