4.7 Review

Flow-following sensor devices: A tool for bridging data and model predictions in large-scale fermentations

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 2908-2919

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.004

Keywords

Sensor device; Flow-follower; Modelling; Computational fluid dynamics; Model validation; Mixing; Gradients; Large-scale bioreactor; Industrial biotechnology

Funding

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark [7038-00056B, 4105-00020B]
  2. Freesense [7038-00056B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production-scale fermentation processes in industrial biotechnology experience gradients in process variables, such as dissolved gases, pH and substrate concentrations, which can potentially affect the production organism and therefore the yield and profitability of the processes. However, the extent of the heterogeneity is unclear, as it is currently a challenge at large scale to obtain representative measurements from different zones of the reactor volume. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models have proven to be a valuable tool for better understanding the environment inside bioreactors. Without detailed measurements to support the CFD predictions, the validity of CFD models is debatable. A promising technology to obtain such measurements from different zones in the bioreactors are flow-following sensor devices, whose development has recently benefitted from advancements in microelectronics and sensor technology. This paper presents the state of the art within flow-following sensor device technology and addresses how the technology can be used in large-scale bioreactors to improve the understanding of the process itself and to test the validity of detailed computational models of the bioreactors in the future. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available