Journal
CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092487
Keywords
patient reported outcomes; quality of life; pancreatic cancer; radiotherapy
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01CA227517-01A1]
- Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RR140012]
- V Foundation [V2015-22]
- Kimmel Foundation
- Sabin Family Foundation Fellowship
- Reaumond Family Foundation
- Childress Institute Funds
- McNair Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Simple Summary Cancer therapies should improve patient survival or at least improve the quality of their life as they receive treatment for their disease. This is particularly important in pancreatic cancer, where current treatments often have to balance between limiting tumor growth and minimizing patient toxicity. There has been an increasing appreciation among physicians to capture the patient's voice using tools called patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). In this article, we describe the available PROMs and their relative strengths and weaknesses to help oncologists make sense of this rapidly growing field. Finally, we present a decision-making tool that can help researchers and clinicians select the ideal PROM that fits their needs. Pancreatic cancer and its treatment often dramatically impact patients' quality of life (QoL). Given this, as well as increased focus on QoL measures in clinical oncology, there has been a rise in the number of instruments that measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this review, we describe the landscape of different PRO instruments pertaining to pancreatic cancer, with specific emphasis on PRO findings related to pancreatic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT). Twenty-five of the most commonly utilized PROs are compared in detail. Notably, most of the PRO tools discussed are not specific to pancreatic cancer but are generic and have been used in various malignancies. Published findings concerning PROs in pancreatic cancer involving RT are also extracted and summarized. Among the measures used, the European Organization for Research and Treatment Cancer QLQ-C30 was the most commonly utilized. We recommend a careful selection of PRO measures in clinical pancreatic cancer research and care and encourage the use of a combination of symptom-specific and global QoL tools to more fully capture patients' perspectives.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available