4.7 Review

Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103357

Keywords

3-dimensional printing; additive manufacturing; dental models; accuracy; systematic review; full-arch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of additive manufacturing in dentistry has exponentially increased with dental model construction being the most common use of the technology. Henceforth, identifying the accuracy of additively manufactured dental models is critical. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and evaluate the accuracy of full-arch dental models manufactured using different 3D printing technologies. Seven databases were searched, and 2209 articles initially identified of which twenty-eight studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analysed. A meta-analysis was not possible due to unclear reporting and heterogeneity of studies. Stereolithography (SLA) was the most investigated technology, followed by digital light processing (DLP). Accuracy of 3D printed models varied widely between <100 to >500 mu m with the majority of models deemed of clinically acceptable accuracy. The smallest (3.3 mu m) and largest (579 mu m) mean errors were produced by SLA printers. For DLP, majority of investigated printers (n = 6/8) produced models with <100 mu m accuracy. Manufacturing parameters, including layer thickness, base design, postprocessing and storage, significantly influenced the model's accuracy. Majority of studies supported the use of 3D printed dental models. Nonetheless, models deemed clinically acceptable for orthodontic purposes may not necessarily be acceptable for the prosthodontic workflow or applications requiring high accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available