4.7 Article

Comparative Analysis of Thrombin Calibration Algorithms and Correction for Thrombin-α2macroglobulin Activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103077

Keywords

blood coagulation factors; blood coagulation tests; calibration; plasma; thrombin

Funding

  1. Postgraduate and Postbaccalaureate Research Fellowship Award from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Postgraduate and Postbaccalaureate Research Fellowship Award from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The thrombin generation (TG) test is useful for characterizing global hemostasis potential, but fluorescence substrate artifacts, such as thrombin-alpha 2macroglobulin (T-alpha 2MG) signal, inner filter effect (IFE), substrate consumption, and calibration algorithms have been suggested as sources of intra- and inter-laboratory variance, which may limit its clinical utility. Methods: Effects of internal vs. external normalization, IFE and T-alpha 2MG on TG curves in normal plasma supplemented with coagulation factors, thrombomodulin, and tissue factor were studied using the Calibrated Automated Thrombinography (CAT; Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ, USA) and in-house software. Results: The various calibration methods demonstrated no significant difference in producing TG curves, nor increased the robustness of the TG assay. Several TG parameters, including thrombin peak height (TPH), produced from internal linear calibration did not differ significantly from uncalibrated TG parameters. Further, TPH values from internal linear and nonlinear calibration with or without T-alpha 2MG correction correlated well with TPH from external calibration. Higher coefficients of variation (CVs) for TPH values were observed in both platelet-free and platelet-rich plasma with added thrombomodulin. Conclusions: Our work suggests minimal differences between distinct computational approaches toward calibrating and correcting fluorescence signals into TG levels, with most samples returning similar or equivalent TPH results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available