4.5 Article

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Secreted Exosome Promotes Chemoresistance in Breast Cancer via Enhancing miR-21-5p-Mediated S100A6 Expression

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY-ONCOLYTICS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 283-293

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.10.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81960477, 81760478, 81602315, 81660424, 81560468]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M623295XB]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [1598012-42, 2016GXNSFBA380139]
  4. Guangxi Medical University Training Program for Distinguished Young Scholars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging evidence has shown the role of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome (MSC-exo) in inducing resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy. However, it remains unclear whether the change of MSC-exo in response to chemotherapy also contributes to chemoresistance. In this study, we investigated the effect of a standard-of-care chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin (Dox), on MSC-exo and its contribution to the development of Dox resistance in breast cancer cells (BCs). We found that the exosome secreted by Dox-treated MSCs (Dt-MSC-exo) induced a higher degree of Dox resistance in BCs when compared with non-treated MSC-exo. By analysis of the MSC-exo-induced transcriptome change in BCs, we identified S100A6, a chemoresistant gene, as a top-ranked gene induced by MSC-exo in BCs, which was further enhanced by Dt-MSCexo. Furthermore, we found that Dox induced the expression of miR-21-5p in MSCs and MSC-exo, which was required for the expression of S100A6 in BCs. Importantly, silencing of miR-21-5p expression in MSCs and MSC-exo abolished the resistance of BCs to Dox, indicating an exosomal miR-21-5p-regulated S100A6 in chemoresistance. Our study thus uncovered a novel mechanistic insight into the role of MSC-secreted exosome in the development of chemoresistance in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available