4.5 Article

Lower-Band Monochromatic Chorus Riser Subelement/Wave Packet Observations

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JA028090

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [4177415, 41527804, 41774169]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-DQC010]
  3. Indian National Science Academy
  4. Indian National Science Academy (INSA) under the INSA Senior Scientist Fellowship scheme
  5. Science & Technology Research Board (SERB), a statutory body of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India
  6. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three lower-band (f < 0.5 fce) chorus riser elements detected in the dayside generation region were studied in detail using the Van Allen Probe data. Two subelements/wave packets within each riser were examined for their wave frequency constancy within seven consecutive wave cycles. The seven wave cycles contained the maximum amplitudes of the subelements/packets. Maximum variance B1 zero crossings were used for the identification of wave cycle start and stop times. It is found that the frequency is constant to within similar to 3% (one standard deviation), with no evidence of upward frequency sweeping over the seven cycles. Continuous wavelet power spectra for the duration of the seven cycles confirm this conclusion. The implication is that a chorus riser element is composed of coherent approximately monochromatic steps instead of a gradual sweep in frequency over the whole element. There was no upward frequency stepping where the wave amplitude was the largest, contrary to the sideband theory prediction. It is shown that a chorus riser involves instability of cyclotron resonant energetic electrons from similar to 6 to similar to 40 keV at L = 5.8, that is, essentially the whole substorm electron energy spectrum. The above findings may have important consequences for possible wave generation mechanisms. Some new ideas for mechanisms are suggested in conclusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available