4.5 Article

Nutrient Uptake in the Supraglacial Stream Network of an Antarctic Glacier

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JG005679

Keywords

McMurdo Dry Valleys; nutrient tracers; nutrient uptake; supraglacial streams; nitrogen; sediments

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1637708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In polar regions, where many glaciers are cold based (frozen to their beds), biological communities on the glacier surface can modulate and transform nutrients, controlling downstream delivery. However, it remains unclear whether supraglacial streams are nutrient sinks or sources and the rates of nutrient processing. In order to test this, we conducted tracer injections in three supraglacial streams (62 to 123 m long) on Canada Glacier in the Taylor Valley, of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. We conducted a series of additions including nitrate (N), N + phosphate (P), N + P + glucose (C), and N + C. In two reaches, N-only additions resulted in N uptake. The third reach showed net N release during the N-only addition, but high N uptake in the N + P addition, indicating P-limitation or N + P colimitation. Coinjecting C did not increase N-uptake. Additionally, in these systems at low N concentrations the streams can be a net source of nitrogen. We confirmed these findings using laboratory-based nutrient incubation experiments on sediment collected from stream channels on Canada Glacier and two other glaciers in the Taylor Valley. Together, these results suggest there is active biological processing of nutrients occurring in these supraglacial streams despite low sediment cover, high flow velocities, and cold temperatures, modifying the input signals to proglacial streams. As glaciers worldwide undergo rapid change, these findings further our understanding of how melt generated on glacier surfaces set the initial nutrient signature for subglacial and downstream environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available