4.7 Article

Balanced multi-objective optimization algorithm using improvement based reference points approach

Journal

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100791

Keywords

Multi-objective optimization problem; CEC 2020; CEC 2009; Equilibrium optimizer; Reference directions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel equilibrium optimizer algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems, which enhances the algorithm's performance by balancing the trade-off between convergence and diversity, as well as improving the exploration and exploitation factors of the algorithm.
In this work, we explore a novel multi-objective optimization algorithm to identify a set of solutions that could be optimal for more than one task. The proposed approach is used to generate a set of solutions that balance the tradeoffbetween convergence and diversity in multi-objective optimization problems. Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) algorithm is a novel developed meta-heuristic algorithm inspired by the physics laws. In this paper, we propose a Multi-objective Equilibrium Optimizer Algorithm (MEOA) for tackling multi-objective optimization problems. We suggest an enhancement for exploration and exploitation factors of the EO algorithm to randomize the values of these factors with decreasing the initial value of the exploration factor with the iteration and increasing the exploitation factor to accelerate the convergence toward the best solution. To achieve good convergence and well-distributed solutions, the proposed algorithm is integrated with the Improvement-Based Reference Points Method (IBRPM). The proposed approach is applied to the CEC 2020, CEC 2009, DTLZ, and ZDT test functions. Also, the inverted generational and spread spacing metrics are used to compare the proposed algorithm with the most recent evolutionary algorithms. It's obvious from the results that the proposed algorithm is better in both convergence and diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available