4.6 Article

Machinability of SLM-produced Ti6Al4V titanium alloy parts

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 768-786

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.035

Keywords

Selective laser melting; Ti6Al4V; Stress relief; Microstructure; Cutting force; Tool wear

Funding

  1. SENAI Institute of Innovation in Manufacturing Systems and Laser, Joinville, SC, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to its vast benefits, Additive Manufacturing (AM) has attracted a great deal of attention during the last two decades. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is one of the most increasingly used AM techniques in the world. The machinability of SLM-manufactured Ti6Al4V parts in as-built (SLM-AB) and stress-relief (SLM-SR) conditions was studied in this work via toroidal milling. A conventional processed Ti6Al4V alloy was tested as a reference. SLM process parameters for producing near fully dense parts were optimized to yield a volumetric energy density of 46.4 J/mm(3). Relative density, microstructure, hardness, residual stresses, surface roughness, cutting forces, tool wear, and chip morphology were evaluated. The SLM-manufactured parts gave a relative density of 99.70 % and higher hardness values than those of the conventional parts by a factor of about 1.2. The conventional, SLM-AB, and SLM-SR Ti6Al4V alloys exhibited microstructures consisting of alpha and beta phases, acicular alpha' martensite, alpha' martensite and some amounts of alpha + beta phases, respectively. The conventional alloy had the lowest residual stress. SLM-AB had considerable residual tensile stress in the 0 degrees direction of measurement, whereas SLM-SR had the highest compressive stress in both 0 degrees and 90 degrees directions. The lowest cutting force was observed in the conventional alloy and the highest in the SLM-SR alloy. The SLM-AB alloy featured the highest flank wear. However, no significant difference in flank wear was observed in the conventional and SLM-SR alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available